The “Wagatha Christie” trial: verdict within the Vardy v Rooney defamation case | Defamation regulation

The “Wagatha Christie” trial: verdict within the Vardy v Rooney defamation case |  Defamation regulation
Written by admin
The “Wagatha Christie” trial: verdict within the Vardy v Rooney defamation case |  Defamation regulation

It has taken virtually three years of authorized arguments, tens of millions of kilos in authorized charges and an usually excruciating public trial – however at lunchtime on Friday the world will lastly know who has received the ‘Wagatha Christie’ defamation case.

The case, introduced by Rebekah Vardy in opposition to fellow footballer spouse Coleen Rooney, performed out over seven days in Could on the Excessive Court docket in central London. Rooney had alleged that tales from her personal Instagram account have been leaked by Vardy to journalists on the Solar. Vardy stated this was false and sued Rooney in an try to clear her identify, placing strain on Rooney to again up her declare.

Potential outcomes embody outright victory for Vardy and the award of considerable damages on the idea that Rooney’s circumstantial proof was inadequate to justify her defamation accusation; vindication for Rooney on the idea that she had good purpose to make the allegation in opposition to Vardy and that it was within the public curiosity; or an ungainly half-way verdict the place Vardy wins on a technicality however is awarded solely a token sum in damages.

A media circus grew up across the trial, with headlines world wide protecting particulars of every part from Peter Andre’s private anatomy to Vardy’s requests to be paid to promote tales to the Solar, claiming {that a} cell phone containing probably essential WhatsApp messages was intentionally was launched. out into the North Sea after a request was made to go looking it.

Nonetheless, as the usage of juries has been successfully abolished for defamation trials in England and Wales, there was no instant verdict on who had received the case. When the trial ended, everybody moved on. The footballers’ wives and their households went on trip, the attorneys took on different lawsuits, and for the general public it was quiet.

What has actually occurred is that the Excessive Court docket Choose Mrs. Justice Steyn has spent the final two months contemplating the proof and related elements of the regulation. The choose, who, as Vardy and Rooney have been usually reminded, was the one one that actually mattered within the courtroom, has now written up her sentence. As an alternative of taking it to courtroom and getting the outdated media circus again collectively, it’ll merely be printed on-line at midday for the affected events to digest and presumably attraction.

The case was a uncommon defamation trial at a time when the English and Welsh authorized system strongly encourages instances to be settled earlier than they arrive to courtroom. With neither aspect keen to again down, the end result was an all-out courtroom battle. Each events have been rich girls with excessive media profiles who will be capable to afford the authorized charges whatever the verdict – making the case as a lot about each side’ reputations within the public eye because the precise authorized end result.

On the coronary heart of the case was whether or not Rooney – the spouse of former England footballer Wayne Rooney – may substantiate her unique declare that Vardy – the spouse of Leicester Metropolis’s Jamie Vardy – was the one who made the leak.

Rooney’s unique accusation, after an intensive sting operation, acknowledged she believed “It was ………… Rebekah Vardy’s story” who leaked tales to the Solar. Rooney has all the time maintained that she meant her publish to imply that somebody with entry to Rebekah Vardy’s Instagram account made the leak, slightly than essentially Vardy herself.

However at a preliminary listening to, a choose dominated that Rooney was making a direct private accusation in opposition to Vardy. This allowed Vardy to assert in courtroom that her former agent Caroline Watt could have been the true leaker, appearing with out her data.

Mockingly, hope for Rooney could come from an unlikely supply – Observer journalist Carole Cadwalladr’s current success in a defamation case introduced by Brexit marketing campaign financier Arron Banks.

That case was overseen by the identical choose, who accepted Cadwalladr’s public curiosity protection on the idea that the journalist had “affordable grounds to imagine that her supposed which means was true” when it was made.

Rooney will likely be hoping {that a} comparable interpretation of the regulation will likely be made in her favor – and can imply she was legally justified in making the declare in opposition to Vardy.

About the author


Leave a Comment